Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Will Knowland's avatar

Who thinks long articles like this would be better as podcasts?

Expand full comment
Alexander McClintock's avatar

Thank you for this thought provoking article. I enjoyed reading it.

I greatly prefer the written form. I can read it at my leisure, breaking off here and there to savour a passage or to look up a word and perhaps to indulge in a diversion as the etymology leads me to other thoughts. The written form also allows references to sources and places for further reading. I find that podcasts not only allow none of these, they allow no time for reflection. In consequence, I take in much less and retain much less. Podcasts usually leave me with little more than an impression of what a subject might be about if I were to read about it.

At one time the programme In Our Time on Radio 4 offered an email service which supplied the text of the programme. These programmes last for about 45 minutes. I worked through these email every week for several months. I found that most contained two ideas, a single example contained three and one contained only one idea. The rest of the programme was taken up with entertaining padding. I concluded that broadcasts and podcasts are a poor medium for conveying ideas, particularly ideas which require thought and challenge.

For these reasons, I think the written form will remain the best form for discussion of ideas.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts