If you don’t approve homosexuality, you’re homophobic. You’re afraid. You’re insecure about your masculinity. Maybe you’re even a closet homosexual.
That’s what millions of teenage boys are taught. And it’s wrong. Disgust, not fear, is the male response to homosexuality. So what’s the difference between disgust and fear? And why aren’t men disgusted by lesbians?
Fear is a response to immediate danger, whereas disgust is about avoiding contamination. Different parts of the brain are involved. Men don’t feel a personal threat to their masculinity from gays. They are disgusted by a general threat to sex-related morality. The threat is to group cohesion. And the morality involved relates to authority and sanctity as well.
Men are concerned with policing males within the social group. And this is wider than just sex. Boys use “homophobic" terms without reference to homosexuality and long before sexual maturity. Peaking in early secondary-school years, terms like ‘bender’ and ‘gaylord’ are really about enforcing masculine norms, elevating and preserving status, and enhancing friendship.
It’s about clamping down on potential defection from the group. Failure to show group allegiance is punished. Immature, weak or cowardly? Gay. Too emotional, pacifistic or effeminate? Gay. Don’t play team sports? Gay.
Young boys don’t fully understand what they’re doing here, but this language, as Plummer puts it,
“patrols an intra-gender divide between successful collective masculinity and male otherness … it sanctions and polices stereotypical standards of masculinity and it proscribes immaturity and peer group betrayal too. Homophobia seems to arise from a more general preoccupation that boys should not deviate from the quest to become physically mature, peer-oriented, powerful, sexually potent men.”(Plummer, 2001, p. 6)
So it’s about social deviance — and not only men but also women see gays this way. Lesbians, by contrast, are viewed more positively by both. Whereas women don’t exist in a dominance hierarchy, the male hierarchy is vital to the functioning of the group. It isn’t allowed to be disrupted. The black sheep effect means an in-group member posing a threat to group identity is treated far more negatively than is someone from an out-group. For in-group identification, trustworthiness is more important than competence or sociability.
Viking attitudes to homosexuality show this. They believed a man who submitted to another man sexually would do the same in other areas: homosexuality was equated with cowardice and passivity. Performing intercourse with a beloved friend was regarded as the worst sort of betrayal or lack of loyalty.
Homosexuality, then, disgusts men because it deviates from the masculine social roles based in biology that dignify their lives. And for a community not to take pride in these is suicide. If parents, teachers and social policies fail to police this, adolescent peer groups inevitably will. The body is instinctively conservative, and disgust is ineradicable.
Please share this because most people have never heard any of it before. And the facts must be faced because reality always wins in the end.
References
Morrison, T. G., Kiss, M., Bishop, C. J., & Morrison, M. A. (2019). “We’re disgusted with queers, not fearful of them:” The interrelationships among disgust, gay men’s sexual behavior, and homonegativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(7), 1014-1033.
Wang, R., Yang, Q., Huang, P., Sai, L. & Gong, Y. (2019). The association between disgust sensitivity and negative attitudes toward homosexuality: the mediating role of moral foundations. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1229
Cunningham, E., Forestell, C.A. & Dickter, C.L. (2013). Induced disgust affects implicit andexplicit responses toward gay men and lesbians. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 362-369
Inbar Y., Pizarro D.A., Knobe J. & Bloom P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9, 435-439
Dasgupta, N., DeSteno, D., Williams, L.A. & Hunsinger, M. (2009). Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice. Emotion, 9, 585-591
Tapias, M.P., Glaser, J., Keltner, D., Vasquez, K. & Wickens, T. (2006). Emotion and prejudice: specific emotions toward outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 27-39
Xu, M., Li, Z., Ding, C., Zhang, J., Fan, L., Diao, L., & Yang, D. (2015). The divergent effects of fear and disgust on inhibitory control: an ERP study. PloS one, 10(6), e0128932
Crawford J.T., Inbar Y. & Maloney V. (2014). Disgust sensitivity selectively predicts attitudes toward groups that threaten (or uphold) traditional sexual morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 218-223
Wang, R., Yang, Q., Huang, P., Sai, L. & Gong, Y. (2019). The association between disgust sensitivity and negative attitudes toward homosexuality: the mediating role of moral foundations. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1229
Reigeluth, C.S. & Addis, M.E. (2016). Adolescent boys’ experiences with policing of masculinity: Forms, functions, and consequences. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(1), 74-83
Van Leeuwen, F., Miton, H., Firat, R.B. & Boyer, P. (2016). Perception of gay men as defectors and commitment to group defense predict aggressive homophobia. Evolutionary Psychology.
Marques, J.M. & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intragroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292
Marques, J.M., Yzerbyt, V.Y., & Leyens, J-Ph. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16
Leach, C.W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234-249
Monogamous lifetime mating with female mate selection produces a society where men have to meet the requirements to be a desirable mate before they get sexual access. Hence the disgust response to both rapists and male homosexuals as they circumvent the requirements to get sexual access and 'cheat' the males who gain their sexual access by fulfilling the requirements set by females and society to be seen as a valuable, productive and reliable mate.
There are evolutionary reasons for homophobia that are worth considering too. Below is a cut and paste from the 'leaky vaccine' telegraph group:
Disgust and Contagion,
Research shows healthy normal people show the same biochemical reaction to seeing gay men kissing as when they are shown maggots crawling over eachother.
"The results of the current study suggest that all individuals, not just highly sexually prejudiced individuals, may experience a physiological response indicative of stress when witnessing a male same-sex couple kissing."
What do two men kissing and a bucket of maggots have in common? Heterosexual men’s indistinguishable salivary α-amylase responses to photos of two men kissing and disgusting images | Psychology & Sexuality (2017)
Being averse to and disgusted by homosexualists is not just randomly coded into our instincts to be mean and hateful for no reason.
Here is an excerpt from a book by Richard Berkowitz, a gay Jewish man, Stayin' Alive: The Invention Of Safe Sex (2003):
"I estimate I've had approximately 3,000 men up my butt ... I estimate that I went to the baths at least once a week, sometimes twice, and that each time I went I had a minimum of four patners ... I also racked up about three men a week for five years at the Christopher Steet bookstore ...Then of course there was the MineShaft; the orgies; the 55th Street Playhouse; the International Stud backroom ..."
"Let me present my own history of STDs. From 1973, when I came out, to 1975, I only got mononucloeosis and non-specific urethritis, or NSU. In 1975, I got my first case of gonorrhea. Not bad, I thought. I'd had maybe 200 different partners, and I'd only gotten the clap twice. But then, moving from Boston to New York City, it all began to snowball."
"First came hepatitis A in '76 and more gonorrhea and NSU. In 1977, I was diagnosed with amebiasis, an intestinal parasite, hepatitis B, more gonorrhea, and NSU. In 1978, more amebiasis and my first case of shigella, and of course, more gonorrhea. Then in 1979, hepatitis yet a third time, this time non-A, non-B, more intestinal parasites, adding giardia this time, and an anal fissure as well as my first case of syphilis ... By 1981, I got some combination of STDs each and every time I had sex ..."
"At age twenty-seven I've had: gonorrhea, syphillis, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis non-A, non-B; intestinal parasites including amebiasis, e. historicia, shigella, giardia; herpes simplex types one and two; venereal warts, mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, and now cryptosporodiosis, for which there is no known cure."
They are not "just like you and me", and the media is desperately trying to keep a lid on that fact. Though the actual threat of Monkeypox toward the normal population remains low, there is no doubt occupation media would sacrifice public health in an instant for the feelings of sexual deviants, who have been historically oppressed for good reasons of which we are being reminded of in new ways all the time.
Happy Pride! 🏳️🌈